"Would you like to save a child for only one dollar a day?" Part 2
"Would you like to save a child for only one dollar a day?" Part 1
I started working for Top Notch Advertizing Inc in the beginning of this summer, when I was in the middle of looking for summer employment. I scoured the internet of ads and postings hoping I would be able to find a quality, if not, well paid position. It was extremely difficult. Government offices were not accepting my resumes and applications and I was feeling the pressures of getting a job as by this point, my father had been out of work for a year and a half.
Understanding Myself.. part 1
LMOM 3.0
A Last Word...Perhaps
I cannot, with a straight face, pretend that I have kept up with this website. Nor, I imagine, have you. For this I offer the following reasons: one, that other work, especially in the educational sector, has multiplied in quantity and quality; two, that I have become more interested in a sports capacity, and have moved on to different internet communities; three, that the sheen of the undiscovered wonders of the internet has largely worn off, which is perhaps not a positive. Nevertheless, I’ve been struggling to get an idea out of my mind, and seeing it as an opportunity to use this site for that purpose which it was originally designed: to offer my own half-assed opinion. Thus, to whosoever may pass by, I ask this question simply as a point for reflection:
I think there is a strong sentiment, amongst the more politically attuned of us, to villainize the Corporation. By this I mean, to render the corporation as a faceless, cruel monster to which we all fall victim – to make it the villain. I am by no means an ardent supporter of MNCs (those who know my political views would know that I am hardly ultra-capitalist), and to some extent this is true. But can we absolve ourselves, the consuming public, of all blame?
There is always a desire to attack corporations for acts that appear quite clearly to be wrongdoings. We condemn the Exxon Valdez for negligence resulting in environmental catastrophe; moreover, we raise the point that double-hulled ships should have been considered necessary. We berate companies for the use of sweatshops and other methods of cutting cost by cutting the quality working conditions. Most obviously, we despise the Bush regime for its apparent economic motives for wars in the Middle East.
Those are all, I hope you agree, terrible things, and I do not argue that such a desire is necessarily misplaced. Anyone who doubts our complicity in these actions will argue that hardly any member of the consuming public would have wished such things to occur, and I can only agree. Complicity can be found in a number of other ways, but again, we can point to fixed elections, limited purchasing capacity, and covered-up information to remove ourselves from the equation. It is these evil corporations and governments who are to blame, and not us. We are two, separate, distinct entities. At least, that is a common attitude.
However, we are inextricably linked. It is naïve, I think, to believe that we are enslaved to these institutions, and that the relationships are not at all reciprocal. After all, as much as we provide funds for them, they are to provide services and products for us. And it is the desire of the vast majority of Western society, I would think, to live as decadently as is possible in our respective incomes. We want to be able to get as much as possible – a result of this is that we, for the most part, demand as low prices as possible. If products A and B could be purchased when manufactured in Country Y for the same price as only product A when manufactured in Country X, the majority of us would want the former. Part of this materialism stems from the relentless advertising of corporations, but more still stems from basic human selfishness.
It is, therefore, not necessarily with great malice that corporations go into third-world countries for manufacturing purposes or raw materials. The Exxon Valdez used a single-hulled ship not out of hatred for the environment but for the desire to offer as low a price as possible: these low-as-possible prices originate from our desire to be able to afford more. The result is that other things: the environment, the third world, etc. end up paying the difference.
The Exxon Valdez, I think, is a good example, because our way of life is entirely predicated on cheap oil, and cheap energy. Suburbia is made possible by it. The ability to have international products and food transported to us is made possible by it. The ability to heat our houses in the winter and cool them in the summer, to power our electronics, to keep our food refrigerated: all of this is made possible (or fueled, to use a pun) by cheap energy.
In this way, in this relentless demand for as low-as-possible prices, we are made indirectly but ultimately very directly complicit. To be sure, much of the wrongdoings of corporations originate from their desire to turn a buck, but a large part of this is to fulfill the demand of low costs to the consumers: because, for the most part, we want to live as decadently as possible, so long as we aren’t directly wronging someone. Out of sight wrongdoings, however, are out of mind.
It is for this reason that I roll my eyes when well-meaning souls muse that they wish everybody had it as good as they do. The polarization of the world is not coincidental or a case of us simply not printing enough money for the other 80%: our standard of life is predicated on the poverty of the rest of the world. I do not feel that blaming the corporation or placing more restrictions on them is a way of solving this issue. We have to take a good look at ourselves. What this means is reduced consumption (alternative forms of energy, for all they’ve been lauded, may not make up for the peaking of oil), and more ethical consumption when we do consume.
Ethical consumption does, of course, mean increased prices. This is a sacrifice we must make if we have any real desire to improve the other man’s lot. Corporations pursue minimum production costs (and thus, largely limited ethical production) because we have dictated that what we desire are minimum prices. If the consuming public should suddenly up and demand more ethical means of manufacturing – in exchange, of course, for a bit more dough – then any moderately intelligent corporation will listen to those demands.
A good example of this idea is the recent phenomenon of “selling green.” A sizeable portion of companies have bought into this, advertising products that make the consumer believe that they are doing something good for the environment. Another, if less wide-spread phenomenon, is that of Fair Trade, a foundation on which Bridgehead has seen a meteoric rise, at least in Ottawa.
This has not been a final solution, however. Companies still often have one small segment of a product be “green,” but market the product as though it is entirely so. This reminds us that many companies remain a part of the problem. But this is a solution that requires us not merely to make ourselves seem the victim, but recognize our role. We must do much of the work. Otherwise, we will continue to close our eyes as we fire bullets into the rest of the world.
Cinderella: the Hidden Message – (from a Humorous Perspective)
As a note to readers, I wrote the following because I was bored and wanted to practise my writing abilities, I hope you will like it.
The tale of Cinderella is a heart warming classic. It teaches a very valuable lesson to kids: if you believe and follow your dreams, they will come true – a great and timeless moral that will fill children of all ages with hope. However, there is a deep and disturbing underlying message that parents tend to leave out during their nightly ritual of bed time stories. Although Cinderella follows through with her dreams, it is never supposed to have occurred as she does nothing to try and achieve her goals. It is by pure fortuitous chance that she just happens to have a fairy god-mother waiting for her hand-on-foot, ready to pull her out of any devastating situations. When Cinderella’s step-sisters and step-mother goes out to the ball, probably leaving a sink full of dirty dishes behind, Cinderella just plants her derriere on a stool and unleashes the waterworks by the bucketfuls (after she makes sure the plates are sparkling clean, I assume).
Instead of doing anything, like going out of the house or borrowing one of her wicked sisters’ dress (she can leave the house, she’s an adult for Pete’s sake!), she decides to give up and hope, by magic, someone will whisk her out of her desolation and fly her down in front of the prince and have him swoon over her. So in a way, as she forfeits her dream and is about to live as an abused miserable housemaid for the rest of her life, her magical aide comes to clean up her mess of an existence and completely, and I mean completely, turns it around. If only this world had a bit more magic, then all the little girls will be marrying princes, all the little boys will be superheroes, and all the free-market advocates will never have to face retribution. Or is the story telling us that magic is provided to only those who are worthy? Then I wonder to myself, “who makes this judgement?” and “why does that person have so much power?” Nobody should be awarded with this much control over others!
I also question just how happy her life with the prince will truly be. A spoiled royalty who halted the entire nation’s productivity to find a girl he will be sick of after a week, marries a raggedy Anne who knows absolutely nothing about the outside world with the only credentials “kind and do windows.” When it is finally the prince’s turn to rule, I give this kingdom one year before its armies are decimated, its economy left in total ruins, and its head of state becomes nothing more than a “head-on-stake.”
-=n0n4m3=-
p.s. Make comments on my writing, that's what I'm concerned about the most here.
That's it - This has gone on for too long!
NOTE: All Links are Essential to the Essence of the Article!
To all Ottawans: You should already know, without reading the rest of this post of what I am about to say. The OCT has gone too far and too long on this one.
The OCTranspo has been on strike since yesterday morning at 12:01AM (December 11, 2008), amidst a snowstorm, and has put the entire city in pretty much a standstill, a ground halt. Although the city is currently "earning" money through it, each individual in the city, I guarrantee you, is not. I know my family has already lost the greater half of a grand over these two days which is enough money to buy an annual OCT pass, for an adult.
Just what is this strike about? So far, through reading OCT drivers' comments on websites, I interpret the cause of the strike as a need for respect, safe environment, good wage, and fair hours... Which, in my opinion, is exactly what they are receiving right now, but okay, let's hear them out first.
First off, they are saying they want a wage increase of 10% over three years. This was pretty much their primary term in the initial proposal. The city said, no, that's too much, and offered 7% increase over 3 years with $2000 in lump sum to all transit workers - over 2000 of them. Just in lump sum, that is at least $4 000 000 distributed by the city, a city that currently has financial issues itself.
They refused, and said it isn't just about money, it's about respect and safety. Most of them don't know whether if they will make it home by the end of the night (what a load of bull shit). They say there's a possibility of people puking on them, and "attacking" them, and being rude (and which job that deals with the public doesn't?)
Then their next big term was the scheduling issue. The OCT wants block scheduling, and wants to choose the schedules themselves...
Yes, you must be INCREDULOUS at this point. Have you EVER heard of a job where you get to choose your schedules?
I can only imagine the conversation being like this:
Worker: "Yo, Boss! I want monday morning & aft, tuesday morning & aft, wednesday morning & aft, thursday off, and friday morning & aft. That only leaves you with the evenings and thursdays to cover... you want to do that man? Ya, thanks, that'd be great.
While you're at it, fetch me a beer and a paper. Then get down on your knees and suck me off."
I don't even need to say how crazy inefficient this is.
Next comes with the respect. I admit, some bus drivers really do deserve respect. The one I usually encounter on the 87 in the afternoon at Mackenzie King Bridge is very kind and helpful; but the majority of them tend to
a) drive past you a bit and make you run beside it
b) see you coming, and drive off (probably while also laughing manically, and twirling their handlebar moustaches) just for the schadenfreude
c) be COMPLETELY rude to you when you get on
I had one driver threaten to confiscate my month pass because I forgot to write the numbers in.
Thing is, if you want respect, please earn it. Back it up with actual skill, and the respect will come naturally, this is natural law. You can't be respected if you don't deserve it!
We are in an economic slump right now, and large numbers of people are getting laid off. Yet these chaps are pouring oil into the fire by slowing down the activities of the city, and demanding more conditions while they are at it. Hey geniuses, learn the art of retribution. When you fuck with the economy, the enonomy fucks you 10 times harder.
They just obliterated the Communism/Socialism ideal. I had hopes for communism, but now I realize this: humans do not deserve it. This is a huge blow against my beliefs, and now I will go hang myself.
Unions, what used to be organizations for workers' protection, are now abusing their powers and have lost of their original meaning. What they are doing is actually worse that what the Somalian pirates are doing. They are blackmailing the public and holding the city and the public at a ransom, when they finally do receive what they ask for, what do you think is gonna happen for the public? Nothing. What's the benefit for the public? Nothing. In fact, when the union does finally sink their hands into their pile of dirty money, the bus drivers will keep being rude, and the riders will keep getting screwed over.
I seriously feel that I am paying more and more for a poorer and poorer service.
I wonder how much the bus drivers make in the first place. I think I heard from more than one credible sources that the average pay is 60k per year. That's a lot considering what they do and how much education they need for this occupation. If you don't like your job, please quit. There are always people who are more than willing to replace you for less than what you make, and less perks than what you had. You knew the terms when you joined. Don't go complaining about the conditions now.
And I love how someone on a forum said
"alot of people have said in this thread "if they dont like their job they should quit"
why dont those people quit THEIR job and work closer to home so that a bus strike can't affect theM?"
What an intelligent remark. Oh boy, I can't believe how my life could've been complete without that comment. I can't believe how much thought and logic had been put into that rebuttal. Right now, people are disgruntled about OCT employees, not their current employers or their current working conditions. WE ARE ANGRY AT THE OCT, BUT WE STILL LOVE OUR JOBS. So there is absolutely no reason for us to quit... idiot.
Since the OCT crosses 2 provinces, it is out of the juristiction of the city and provinces. It is up to the federal government to enact the law of making transit an essential service, barring transit workers from striking. We all know how efficiently the government is working right now. Face it, we are doomed. All cities require a working public transportation system, pairing them alongside other famous city characters such as CuCu the cop car, Mamby the ambulance, Fucker the firetruck. I guess, in a way, what I'm trying to say is, unless Ottawa gets a proper transit system working, it will never be a very interesting or signifcant city.
Here are a few news clips of reporters talking to the Union head. It's funny because Andre was being totally incooperative for both, and that pretty much sums up what he has to say.
"I have no idea, give me some time to think of some blatant lie"
http://watch.ctv.ca/news/latest/commuter-chaos/#clip120211
http://www.cfra.com/chum_audio/Andre_Cornellier_Dec10.mp3
I got these from Frank.
"No, I will not let my members vote."
Hmm... Well then, the strike has to be justified right?
Here's more information about the discussion:
http://www.octranspo.com/mapscheds/Contingency/FAQs_final%20offer_revLR_en.pdf
You can tell obviously that he is just making up shit. It is just so damn obvious, because if he knew what he was saying or believed what he was doing was justified then he'd have given a proper explanationg without hesitation. Remember, in both cases, the union was being completely disobliging - does that sound like they want to resolve this issue quickly?
Child: "HEY! I think this bread is moldy!"
Mother: "Here's some money, you can go to the store to buy a new loaf"
Child: "No, I want more money, and I want to eat at a restaurant for 5 weeks."
How convincing. This strike is 80% about the money. They think if they extend this shit for a long period of time, then the city will definitely succumb to all demands. Contrarily, I think, when this shit drags on for too long, people will find their own way of surviving in the city. There's a reason we humans, as a species, are still living and existing in this world. Survival of the fittest.
I also love the fact how the picketers are blocking off the university shuttles... even though exams are going on right now. This act pretty much sums up how low these workers will stoop.
Thanks a lot OCT, it's not like I don't have enough things to juggle in my hands. Now you've taken away my independence as well, and made me miss an ortho appointment. What used to be a 20 minute trip for 2 dollars has now been extended to over an hour for 10 dollars of gas, at the same time, parents' are losing work hours, because they have to pick me up.
You've really done it this time you selfish bastards. You chose the worst time purposefully to inconvenience an entire city, causing loss from damages, increased car accidents, and probably patients in emergency situations to not reach the hospital in time. I hope that extra few buck in your pants can buy back your conscience. Go ahead and picket. We have long lost sympathy for you and your kind just because you pulled this dick move. You want respect? Stop this damn strike. I just hope somebody in a position of power will act soon, and send these sloths to their work without any changes to their contracts whatsoever.
"Do you want negotiations? Suck my dick and then we'll talk. "
-=n0n4m3=-
(Btw, I do not agree with privatizing the transit system - there's something sinful to the concept of privatizing a public service)
My Thoughts on the U.S. (World) Financial Crisis
Hello readers of LMOM. I'm sure there are very few of these people still left, but I always found this blog to be a good place to dump my thoughts or opinions.
Today's topic, which has been on my mind for sometime now, is the current financial crisis, an issue which has been bothering us all (if you haven't started worrying about it yet, it's time).
Here's a little background information to those who has not been paying attention or just don't really understand:
*Ahem*
This world has been running on a credit system ever since the introduction of money. What is a legal tender (note)? Why, it's the promise that for whatever services or goods which has been provided toyou, you will pay back that person with that much money's worth in gold. Where is this sum of gold stored? Our national treasuries. This concept of passing down a worthless sheet of paper down as if it's the jewel of the world became quickly popular around the world. What has been a very practical means of transaction was soon taken advantage of by leaders and financially influential people of the world. They started increasing the worth of money when they really didn't have the gold to back up that claim.
If everyone in the world decided to buy back gold at the same time instead of holding on to our money, we would soon find ourselves extremely short changed. The influence on the worth of our money has been slowly evolving and adapting to the changing demands of the consumers (us) and the dealings of business around the world.
No longer solely influenced by the amount of gold a country's treasury has, the price of the dollar has been inflated slowly but surely.
This, my friend, is the credit system.
Does it sound unstable? Well that's because it is. As more demand for a certain country's money increases, their money's worth also increases, just like the stock market; and if demand decreases, the opposite happens. This system can be easily taken advantage of by the richest people world, making them even richer... And it has been! Take a look into the Asian Financial Crisis in 1997.
(I'm not exactly sure if I'm completely right on the above and if you wish to correct me, please do so in the comments section.)
But that was just a short prelude to what I'm about to tell you.
Keeping this in mind let's turn our eyes back to Wall St.
Wall St. has been funded under the credit system where you borrow money to make more money. Doesn't this sound stupid, sounding like the theory of perpetual machines? Well, no, a smart person can take advantage of this and become really rich, and the dumb person will make a poor financial decision equal to the degree of the rich person's financial success, balancing the equation (not every single person can be rich at the same time, and ultimately, there are way more idiots than there are geniuses). But this has just always been a floatsam economy (not a real term, it was made by me), where everything looks steady and firm on the exterior, but will surely break apart or float away one day.
Here's the problem with the credit system. When the financial situation is good, it will function, and it will keep improving. But as soon as the economy hits one hiccup, we could be facing complete and utter failure. Sure things can seem alright in the present, but a problem will come one day, and no one will know when.
As soon as there is enough bad finacial news in the media, some people will abandon their stocks and cease to spend more money, because of this, the demand for stocks decrease, and the price of stocks drop. As soon as there is a slight drop in stocks plus the negative news outputted by the media, more people will start to sell, letting bears (people who either believes or wishes for the stocks to decrease in order to make money or just lack market confidence) overtake the market. If the news isn't bad enough, bulls (opposite of bears) will believe that market will make another rise, thus, restarting the cycle.
But what if the news is really bad?
That brings us back to what happened in 1930.
People were borrowing money to buy investments, markets were HUGELY inflated, and one significant drop made the huge mass of naive fools pull out. Markets plummetted, and people wanted their money pulled out of their banks to ensure their assets. Banks ran out of money, because people who borrowed money to make investments couldn't pay back. Banks went bankrupt (bank raped?), people were left with absolutely no hope, no sense of direction, and, of course, no money.
New policies were developed by our governments after the Great Depression to help prevent this event from ever happening again. But pretty much, as long as this credit system continues, it will always just be a band-aid on an open gash. This system pretty much violates one of the first Chinese peoples' fundamental principles, spend what you have, sparingly, earn what you need, diligently. Of course, this isn't exactly right, if everyone was prudent, no one would be rich. This principle was largely founded after the fall of imperialism in China, and the KMT did a poor job of managing the country. Money was worth less than paper, and vests/clothing were put into banks instead of money. The populace faced extreme hardships and went to bed each night dreaming for a fulfilling meal. Of course, 2 generations later, this sense of prudency will disappear along with their generation, and China's attitude will match that of the Americans'.
Anyways, you should always save a portion of your life savings for emergencies, and you should always spend ONLY what you have / will get in a short period of time with guarrantees. Don't live your life with debts trailing you like a piece of toilet paper on your shoe.
Anyways, in the case of the present American financial situation, the news was bad enough, and there are enough people pulling out.
The subject of the news? Negativity on the reign of Bush (he'll doom us all), huge American debts, oil prices rising at speeds which is only second to that of my penis when my right hand is firmly attached to it, and my left hand is opening a playboy magazine.
The businesses, sensing this change of market direction must follow accounting principles and write off a) their projected earnings and b) their receivable accounts (assuming there is an increased number of people not paying). Giving the investors and consumers a conservative look on their financial situation. This write off will dispel current and potential investors, plummetting their stock prices to new lows. That's what happened with the Lehman Brothers, they acquired an immense amount of bad mortgages, and offered 40-50 year mortgages to people who had no steady income or jobs or appeared to have no valid form of repayment. This caused them to rack up monumental debts when the stocks started to plummet. The problem? They only considered the present. When the times are good, no one remembers the bad, when the times are bad, people wish they would've remembered the bad so the times could've stayed good. Make sense?
Anyways, when the markets plummetted in constant 3 digit figures, they had to write off a bunch of bad debts causing their expected revenue to be lower than their expenses. Seeing this, investors are spooked, and creditors demanded their credit to be paid back in full before they have no more money to pay back (sound familiar?). Since they really don't have the money to pay back creditors - their assets are still tied down with sketchy people who might not even (be able to) pay back - they filed for bankruptcy. Like this, the market crumbles like the dead skin flakes on the back of a 90 year old man. Don't place all your trust in creditors, they will loan you an umbrella when it's sunny, and take it away when it rains.
Just to tell those readers who are confused, the reason the Lehman Brothers offers these of mortgages is because the amount of revenue they earn from interest will be HUGE if the debtors actually pay back in full.
When 1 giant falls, another must be dragged down as well (think of giants falling like dominoes). Washington Manual (WaMu), one of America's BIGGEST banks, the next to follow after Lehman Brothers, fails. The government has to bail it out, people were standing outside bank branches in huge lines waiting to withdraw their money, branches of WaMu run out of money.
This is not a joke, this is not a what if story, this is not a fairy tale with a moral attached recited to kids before they make their tribute to the fucking sand humanoid-monster.
This is happening now.
I want you to take a big breath, and fully grasp that concept. Unless the US government acts soon, more banks will fail, and again, when 1 giant falls, another must be unwillingly tripped in the process, causing a giant(adj) giant(n) rumble on the intersections of Giants Ave and Giantess Blvd, leaving half the world in smoldering ruins, and the other shaking in their own urine, sweat, blood, and tears.
No, it won't be that bad, I'm just exaggerating.
But guys, I mean it, we are witnessing the greatest recession of our time, and the emerging of another world power (after what happens with the US now, no country will be extremely confident with them in a while). Maybe even another Depression, ultimately leading to World War III. This time, we will have the power to wipe this tiny, insignificant, and unspecial planet out of the solar system, and smear it off of the face of the universe. I hope it's not a depression, but who knows what the future can bring us.
What this article meant to do is to inform you people from my point of view. Hopefully, I've done enough to let you want to do research on your own, or to become smart consumer. Know when to spend, and know when to save.
Now's the time to save guys. Technically, in my opinion, now's the time to spend. Everybody in the world, spend your asses off, and our economy will be saved. The $700bn plan will actually help the American people, and probably save the world. But obviously, no one else can hear me, so save up guys, and prepare for an extra harsh, cold, long, and bleak winter.
Oh, sorry, we're already in Canada.
-=n0n4m3=-
PS. Jamie, if you could, can you please ask your dad what he thinks of the situation? He's a prof in Queens teaching economics, I'm sure he has extremely credible opinions, and I'm genuinely interested in what he thinks.
A Follow Up Post
Needless to say, it's the summer time....
AND THERE ARE GREAT MOVIES OUT!!
I want to watch them.
So leave a comment in the comment section which movie you guys want to see and we can go see together.
Here's The List:
Get Smart (Just saw it today):

GREAT movie. Fantastic humour. 5/5. A definite must see.
Ironman:
Heard great reviews - many of you probably saw it already. But meh, I'm posting it here.
Kungfu Panda:

Kids movie, but it got great reviews and looks decent.
The Incredible Hulk:

Looks MUCH better than the 2003 version.
The Dark Knight:

I don't usually like Batman films. Correction. I usually hate Batman films - but this one looks very promising.
Hancock:

Not your average, everyday hero. He's got issues - huge issues. That makes the movie interesting :D.
Step Brothers:

Not really sure if I'm excited or not. But I am willing to watch this movie.
And some notable mentions:
Wall-e
Hellboy II (Need to watch Hellboy I first)
The Mummy (Need to watch The Mummy 2 first)
Starwars - The Clone Wars (Need to watch every other Starwars movie first XD)
So ya, leave a comment on which one you want to see, and we can plan for a little something something (Preferably girls... Lot's of girls.. You other guys butt out!! Or a one-on-one with a girl. Or just A girl).
Peace,
-=n0n4m3=-